Is Targeting Jerami Grant a Risky Move for the Lakers?
As the Los Angeles Lakers head into the offseason, their primary goal is to strengthen their roster after a disappointing first-round exit in the playoffs. Despite this intent, significant changes have yet to materialize, leaving the team largely intact from last season. The most notable shift has been the change in coaching, with former NBA player JJ Redick taking over for Darvin Ham. Redick, who lacks prior coaching experience, now faces the challenge of maximizing the potential of this existing group of players.
The Lakers have been active in seeking roster improvements, yet their efforts have largely been fruitless so far. One name that frequently arises in trade discussions is Jerami Grant, a veteran forward currently with the Portland Trail Blazers. However, the Lakers’ reluctance to part with more than one first-round draft pick has stalled any potential deal. While many fans believe Grant could significantly enhance the team’s 3-and-D capabilities, others caution against pursuing this trade.
In a recent analysis, Andy Bailey from Bleacher Report pointed out that the Lakers may not be the best fit for Grant, despite ongoing speculation. He argues that investing their limited trade resources into acquiring Grant might not be the wisest decision. Notably, Rui Hachimura, who is younger, earns a fraction of Grant’s salary, and had a more productive season, presents a compelling alternative for the Lakers.
Grant’s hefty contract—approximately $29.7 million this season, which escalates annually—presents additional concerns. By the final year of his deal, he will be set to earn $36.4 million at age 33. While Grant can contribute with both his 3-point shooting and defensive skills, Hachimura proved to be an invaluable asset for the Lakers last season, averaging 21.0 points, 3.5 rebounds, and 2.8 assists per game while shooting an impressive 40.2 percent from beyond the arc.
In comparison, Hachimura’s stats show he can hold his own, contributing 13.6 points, 4.3 rebounds, and 1.2 assists per game, along with a superior 3-point shooting percentage of 42.2 percent. Although he may not have Grant’s scoring prowess, his significantly lower salary—around $17 million this season—adds another layer of caution for the Lakers.
Ultimately, while securing Grant could potentially be a beneficial move for Los Angeles, careful consideration is necessary regarding what the team would need to surrender to facilitate such a trade. Balancing immediate improvements against long-term financial commitments will be crucial as the Lakers navigate their roster decisions this offseason.
Be the first to comment